Background: As a key mechanism of disorder, clinical anxiety changes how a defensive motivation system functions in active threat coping contexts. Building on initial evidence that a lab-based escape/avoid preparation task is sensitive to disruptions in underlying defensive activation, current research moved toward implementation as a clinical assessment by testing if task responding predicts symptoms in anxiety treatment seekers. Methods: In our escape/avoid task, unpleasant images are shown after 5.5-second cues that indicate if the upcoming image can be prevented (avoid context), terminated after onset (escape context), or not controlled (no-control comparator). To assess defensive activation during response preparation/threat anticipation, a startle reflex indicator of such activation is probed during each cue. Guided by prior data, 125 individuals were classified into groups based on whether startle was enhanced 1) in a no-control, relative to avoid, context, and 2) in an escape, relative to avoid, context. To test clinical correlates, anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression (Beck Depression Inventory), and worry (Penn State Worry Questionnaire) were then compared across response groups. Results: Anxiety and worry were higher in participants with enhanced no-control and escape startle than in participants with enhanced no-control but not escape startle. Further, depression was higher in participants with under-enhancement of no-control startle than other groups. Finally, when comparing startle-based profiles to canonical questionnaire cut-off score-based groups, ~54-63% convergence emerged. Conclusions: Defensive profiling in escape/avoid contexts shows promise as a prognostic indicator, but a need to continue improving is also indicated. Possibilities to improve predictiveness and reliability are discussed.
Gertler, J. H., Marsicano, C., George, M. S., McTeague, L. M., Sege, C. T.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 1
- Comments 0