Cross-platform harmonization of bulk transcriptomic datasets remains a fundamental challenge for developing cancer biomarkers because of persistent unresolved batch effects. Most harmonization tools are benchmarked on datasets with large inter-group biological differences (for example TCGA tumor types), whereas actionable biomarker mining requires preserving subtle transcriptional distinctions between closely related diagnoses. Here we present ComboBatch, a benchmarking pipeline that evaluates the full cross-product of 14 batch-removal strategies, 3 imputation methods, 33 harmonization algorithms and 2 post-removal conditions across 7,174 samples from 88 germinal-center B-cell lymphoma cohorts spanning four transcriptomic platforms. Scoring 87 quality metrics across 2,234 harmonization approaches, we show that method choice (R2 0.36) and batch-removal strategy (0.26) are the principal determinants of harmonization quality, whereas imputation (0.016) and post-removal (<0.01) are secondary. Feature Specific Quantile Normalization and Surrogate Variable Analysis were the top methods, jointly resolving follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and normal germinal-center B-cell differences in multi-platform and RNA-seq-only compositions, respectively. We provide a data-driven five-scenario decision tree for harmonization method selection, applicable to any retrospective multi-platform transcriptomic study. The ComboBatch pipeline is available on GitHub and can be used for harmonization, allowing bioinformaticians to utilize 33 harmonization and 3 imputation methods according to their needs.
Nikitin, D., Borisov, N. M., Savchenko, M., Bobe, A., Meerson, M., Nesmelov, A., Harutyunyan, N., Paponova, S., Kravets, A., Zaitsev, A., Bagaev, A., Arakelyan, A.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 5
- Comments 0