RNA secondary structure prediction is a fundamental challenge in bioinformatics, essential for understanding the functional roles of non-coding RNAs. Recently, deep learning models have transformed the field with impressive results, leading to critical discussions regarding the validity of current cross-validation strategies. On the one hand, traditional random partitioning yields overop-timistic results due to data leakage from uncontrolled homology. On the other hand, removing from the training set all sequences that exhibit even the slightest resemblance to the testing sequences penalizes learning-based methods by requiring generalization to completely out-of-distribution sequences. While it is very simple to remove sequences and retrain a machine learned model, it is very difficult to remove the experimental data used for parameter tuning and the sequences used for the development of classical thermodynamic methods. Thus, these methods often benefit from an implicit knowledge leakage. In this work we critically review existing cross-validation strategies for RNA secondary structure prediction: random splitting, clustering-based splitting, and leaving one RNA family out for testing. We analyze the advantages and limitations of each strategy, also expanding them towards the future directions to ensure fair comparisons across the full range of sequence similarities, with the same rigor for both classical and learning-based methods.
Bugnon, L., Kulemeyer, G., Gerard, M., Di Persia, L., Stegmayer, G., Milone, D. H.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 9
- Comments 0