Predicting linear B-cell epitopes is a basic immunoinformatics task that has a direct impact on vaccine design and antibody engineering. Recent advances in machine learning have improved predictive performance, but most existing approaches are trained on aggregated datasets and assume that antigenic patterns are conserved across host organisms. This assumption ignores the immunological variability depending on the host and prevents generalizing the model across species. This is the first systematic host-wise evaluation where we present a systematic machine learning-based analysis of host-aware linear B-cell epitope prediction using curated datasets from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB). We build separate datasets for human, mouse, and non-human primate hosts and assess several classification models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). The models exploit feature representations derived from sequences, such as AAIndex descriptors, biochemical properties from ExPASy, and dipeptide composition. Our results show that predictive performance differs substantially across hosts. Models achieve up to 86.07% accuracy and 0.93 ROC-AUC on human datasets but lower performance on mouse and non-human primate datasets. This gap underlies dataset bias and sequence distribution differences, as well as the inability of existing features to capture host-specific immunological context. These results indicate that the prediction of linear B-cell epitopes is intrinsically host-specific, and a single global model does not generalize well across species. We propose to incorporate hostaware modeling strategies and organism-specific features for enhanced predictive reliability and biological relevance.
Gautam, P., Mitra, P., Sinha, I.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 5
- Comments 0