Recent evidence of extensive call sequence use in non-human primates has led to the theory that syntax evolved to mitigate the constraints of their genetically fixed repertoires, before vocal production learning later emerged in humans. However, evidence of similarly extensive sequence repertoires in an open-ended vocal production learner--the Western Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis)--offers a unique opportunity to explore potential alternative pathways to syntactic communication. Our previous work revealed fledgling magpies learn group-specific repertoires of structured call sequences from their social contacts, with more sociable individuals acquiring larger repertoires earlier in development. Notably however, the individual vocal segments that combine to form their calls and call sequences were shared across groups and emerged as early as the first week post-fledging--suggesting the underlying vocal elements may not be learned. Here we utilised acoustic neighbourhood-based dimensionality reduction to compare clustering patterns of vocal segments across magpie fledgling developmental stages, and between fledglings and adults. We found no evidence of acoustic development over time, and no significant distinction between fledgling and adult productions of the same vocal segments. The same coarticulatory effects--where a vocal element is produced differently when combined with another--and geographic variation established previously in adults were supported in fledglings too. These findings support that the vocal building blocks underpinning magpie call sequences are innate, suggesting usage learning better explains how fledglings learn to combine calls. In a species capable of open-ended production learning, this suggests learning to combine existing signals may be more adaptive than productively learning new ones. Rather than evolving solely to compensate for genetically fixed repertoires, syntax may have evolved as a flexible, convergent solution to the various challenges of expanding communicative capacity--whether due to genetic constraints, cognitive limitations or the cost of establishing new meaning in novel signals.
Mason, S. L., Walsh, S. L., Ridley, A. R.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 5
- Comments 0