Premium accounts now available! Sign up and create a premium account. Read more Close

Advertisement

Image

Implementing considered elements of standardisation for Time Kill Curve experiments across multiple sites: A European collaboration perspective

Preprint Created on 17 Jun 2026 bioRxiv

Background: The main advantages of Time Kill Curves (TKCs) in antimicrobial drug development are the ability to track bacterial kill and regrowth over time and with varying drug concentrations. Whilst there are guideline documents in place, such as M26-A in CLSI, there remains scope for individual laboratory differences in practice. Here we evaluated several factors which potentially influenced data generated in TKCs. Methods: Firstly, E. coli ATCC 25922 was used to determine optimum sampling volume, culture vessel volume, CFU enumeration variance factors and static versus agitated cultures in a single laboratory. Secondly, a ring test comprising of TKCs was performed by six laboratories focusing on: standardised inoculum, static culture and two culture vessel sizes 10 mL and 200 uL. Data analysis was performed to determine consistency within centres and between them. Results: Consistently accurate inocula could be achieved by use of: larger sampling volumes between 100 uL > 20 mL; larger culture vessels volumes (10 mL > 100 uL) and higher inocula (10 8 > 1.5x10 5 CFU). Culture agitation during the TKC experiment resulted in reduced killing compared to static cultures. Reproducibility of TKCs was best between centres when they were performed in 10 mL culture vessels. There was more variability per site when performing TKC in 96 well trays. Conclusions: Technical factors such as preparation of inocula, agitation, vessel size and enumeration of cultures are important variables in performing TKCs that need to be standardised in drug development programmes involving multiple laboratory centres.

Attwood, M. L. G., Bronstrup, M., Das, S., Fuchs, H., Griffin, P., Hinkelmann, B., Hoare, L., Lebrat, J., Marchand, S., Mercer, D., Michel, F., Noel, A., Nussbaumer-Proll, A., Zeitlinger, M., MacGowan, A. P.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement