Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a cornerstone of marine biodiversity monitoring, yet it recovers genetic material irrespective of organism viability and may therefore conflate historical and contemporary community signals. Environmental RNA (eRNA), derived from less stable ribonucleic acid, is hypothesized to be biased toward metabolically active organisms and may provide a more temporally resolved snapshot of living communities. Here we present a paired eDNA/eRNA metabarcoding comparison across a tropical marine seascape, analyzing 19 co-sampled sites spanning coral reefs, mangroves, a seagrass bed, shipwrecks, a cenote, and coastal infrastructure around San Andres Island, Colombia. To our knowledge this is the first in situ, ecosystem-scale paired eDNA/eRNA survey of the broad eukaryotic community across multiple natural habitat types in a tropical marine system, extending mesocosm and freshwater work (e.g., Giroux et al., 2022) to a field setting. Using COI-region amplicon sequencing processed by NatureMetrics, we recovered 1,944 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across the 19 paired sites. Of these, 1,015 (52.2%) were detected by both approaches, 305 (15.7%) were unique to eDNA, and 624 (32.1%) were unique to eRNA. The eRNA-unique fraction was taxonomically enriched for groups including diatoms (class Bacillariophyceae, phylum Ochrophyta), ciliates, and other protists. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed that eRNA recovered significantly higher OTU richness (median 239 vs. 207; W = 36, p = 0.016) and Shannon diversity (median 3.64 vs. 3.38; W = 40, p = 0.026) than eDNA. The mean per-site Jaccard similarity between paired samples was 0.40, indicating substantial turnover in the rare-taxon composition recovered by each method. Principal coordinates analysis of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity showed that habitat type structured abundance-weighted community composition (PERMANOVA F = 2.49, p = 0.001) whereas molecular method did not (F = 1.37, p = 0.107). A PERMDISP test found homogeneous multivariate dispersion between methods (F = 0.01, p = 0.92), reinforcing the absence of a method effect, but significant dispersion heterogeneity among habitats (F = 24.0, p < 0.01), so the habitat result is interpreted with caution. Indicator species analysis identified 73 OTUs significantly associated with one template: eDNA indicators were dominated by dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) and eRNA indicators by diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) and fungi, consistent with an eRNA bias toward metabolically active microbial eukaryotes. A read-weighted overlap analysis showed that although eRNA-unique OTUs outnumbered eDNA-unique OTUs roughly two to one, the large majority of reads (>95%) fell in shared OTUs, so method-unique detections are predominantly rare taxa. We discuss the complementary value of eRNA for marine monitoring, with the seagrass habitat - where eRNA reduced masking by terrestrial plant material - as the clearest use case, and propose, rather than prescribe, the integration of eRNA into routine programs.
Bedingfield, S. K., Vanegas Moreno, C., More, A. F.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 6
- Comments 0