Premium accounts now available! Sign up and create a premium account. Read more Close

Advertisement

Image

Modeling of Glucosinolate Biosynthesis During Biotic Stress as a Function of mRNA

Preprint Created on 31 May 2026 bioRxiv

Glucosinolates are an important group of specialized metabolites in the Brassicaceae family, playing a role as defensive compounds against biotic attackers. In response to biotic stress, plants upregulate glucosinolate biosynthesis in part by increasing the abundance of enzymes in the glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway. As an increase in enzyme abundance is often preceded by an increase in the corresponding mRNA levels, the dynamic changes in mRNA levels should capture the information required to infer how metabolite levels change over time. In order to test this hypothesis, a time series of experimental glucosinolate content data collected from Arabidopsis thaliana, exposed to either a mock or methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment, as a proxy for biotic stress, was combined with existing mRNA abundance data over time at the same developmental stage and treatment. We propose the GEEM model, a multilevel mechanistic ordinary differential equation (ODE) model, which goes from Gene expression to an enzyme level model, followed by a Michaelis Menten kinetics metabolite model, to simulate the dynamics of a segment of the indolic glucosinolate pathway. In order to constrain the GEEM model, three models were fit to experimental de novo specialized metabolite data, using different degrees of freedom by utilizing both a Gradient Boosted Tree model with a tested architecture to predict the kinetic constants, and augmenting these predictions with a literature review of the known Michaelis Menten kinetic constants from the glucosinolate pathway. Using Sequential Monte Carlo - Approximate Bayesian Computing to fit the GEEM model to the experimental data, we showed that given the mRNA levels and initial concentrations of metabolites, the changes in specialized metabolites over time and treatment can be modeled.

Earle, J., Neefjes, A. C. M., Ploeger, X. S. D., van Laar, M., Van Wees, S. C. M., Schuurink, R. C., van Dijk, A. D. J., Bleeker, P., Hoefsloot, H.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement