Introduction: Many plant species secrete nectar to attract beneficial animals. The chemical composition of floral nectar influences pollinator nutrition and behavior, as well as microbial growth in flowers. Yet factors that predict nectar composition across plant species, as well as chemical compounds determining microbial growth in nectar, remain poorly understood. Methods: We used both targeted and untargeted metabolomics to compare the nectar chemical profiles across 31 phylogenetically diverse plant species that span a range of floral morphologies. We examined the common classes of compounds detected in nectar and patterns of co-occurrence among them. We combined newly collected chemical data with previously published data on microbial growth in nectar of the same plant species to examine how nectar chemistry is associated with microbial growth. Results: Plant species and clades varied in amino acid, minor sugar, and secondary metabolite composition and concentration. Sampled rosids and lilioids generally contained higher amino acids while asterids contained greater concentrations of oligosaccharides and sugar alcohols. Across plant species, proteinogenic amino acids frequently co-occurred in nectar but many were negatively associated with sucrose concentration. Plant species with greater concentrations of amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds hosted greater microbial density in nectar, while some other compound groups were negatively associated with microbial diversity. Conclusions: Negative correlations between nectar amino acid and sucrose concentration across species suggest ecological tradeoffs or physiological constraints in nectar composition. Given that the growth of common nectar microbes is limited by amino acid concentration, these findings suggest an ecological cost to amino acid production in nectar. Finally, we document variation among species in nectar vitamins, non proteinogenic amino acids and secondary metabolites with hypothesized yet currently untested ecological roles.
Vannette, R., Rering, C., Cecala, J. M., Landucci, L., Lanier, A.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 14
- Comments 0